- From: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:12:52 -0400
- To: michael.mahan@nokia.com, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Could you elaborate? I have sent Chris a word document with terminology,etc around the first triangle (requesteer provider) and it includes a simple scenario. Are you recommending that we take that same scenario and develop a P2P and intermediary version? Somehow, it feels like you are implying more than that... Heather Kreger Web Services Lead Architect STSM, SWG Emerging Technology kreger@us.ibm.com 919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 michael.mahan@nokia.com@w3.org on 09/24/2002 11:51:33 AM Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org To: Heather Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <www-ws-arch@w3.org> cc: Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f If implicit in these logical views is a grounding to a single scenario, then I am in complete accord. Regards, Mike >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Heather Kreger [mailto:kreger@us.ibm.com] >Sent: September 23, 2002 05:37 PM >To: www-ws-arch@w3.org; Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) >Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f > > > > > > >How about we do the simple triangle first that 'seems' client >server. I >have sent words for the triangle to chris the editor to render in >acceptable xml. > >The only problem with the triange with the peer to peer is >that it makes it >look like the pure requester is part of the scenario. I'd >rather create a >new triangle that we present separately with appropriate words. > >So, first simple 'requester/provider' triangle (btw, we didn't >call them >client and server on purpose for exactly this reason) >Then we do a peer to peer >And then Rogers variation: >See attached: > >(See attached file: triangle.variations.ppt) > >ideas? > >Heather Kreger >Web Services Lead Architect >STSM, SWG Emerging Technology >kreger@us.ibm.com >919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 > > >michael.mahan@nokia.com@w3.org on 09/23/2002 03:28:58 PM > >Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org > > >To: <jones@research.att.com>, ><RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, Heather > Kreger/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS >cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org> >Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f > > > >Here is a diagram which better demonstrates p2p graphically. > >BR, Mike > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: ext jones@research.att.com [mailto:jones@research.att.com] >>Sent: September 23, 2002 01:57 PM >>To: RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com; jones@research.att.com; >>kreger@us.ibm.com >>Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org >>Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f >> >> >> >>I think the compromise would be to base most of the initial discussion >>around the simple, unadorned triangle, laying out the range of >>possibilities >>in the text. The elaborated diagrams should either reflect a union of >>the abstractions and/or instantiations in the space or should reflect >>a particular architectural style. I would be comfortable with >>the former >>if it doesn't make things too confusing, but would gladly accept the >>latter. >> >>--mark >> >>Mark A. Jones >>AT&T Labs >>Shannon Laboratory >>Room 2A-02 >>180 Park Ave. >>Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971 >> >>email: jones@research.att.com >>phone: (973) 360-8326 >> fax: (973) 236-6453 >> >> From RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com Mon Sep 23 13:45 EDT 2002 >> Delivered-To: jones@research.att.com >> X-Authentication-Warning: mail-pink.research.att.com: >>postfixfilter set sender to RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com using -f >> X-Server-Uuid: EE520CAE-7FCA-4D2A-A2DC-297BA4A725CC >> From: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" >><RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com> >> To: "'Mark Jones'" <jones@research.att.com>, >> "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com> >> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org >> Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f >> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:44:36 -0700 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> X-WSS-ID: 11918CF6275166-01-01 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20 >> >> I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually >>to restrict web >> services to one messaging pattern. No matter what the >>words might say in >> the text, I think that having pictures that leave this >>impression would not >> be good. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Jones [mailto:jones@research.att.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:50 PM >> To: Heather Kreger >> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org >> Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f >> >> >> Heather, >> >> I added 3 slides at the end of the set that you sent >>out. I rearranged >> and simplified the boxes and labels a bit. I also >>began to append >> concrete technology labels on some of the boxes. (I >>just made a cursory >> pass at this to see what it would look like. Feel free >>to further flesh >> it out.) At least while we are deciding on the correct >>set of boxes and >> labels, I think it helps to identify them. >> >> Mark Jones >> AT&T >> >> >> Heather Kreger wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >> >Hi folks, Here are the architecture diagrams I drafted >>up during our >> >meeting today. I have some words for some of this >>stuff that I will >> >align and send to the group as soon as >> >humanly possible. >> > >> >(See attached file: w3cStack.ppt) >> > >> >I have permission from IBM to submit both this stack >>and the origional >> >triangle to the W3C for inclusion into the architecture and >> >modification by the working group. >> > >> >Heather Kreger >> >Web Services Lead Architect >> >STSM, SWG Emerging Technology >> >kreger@us.ibm.com >> >919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 >> > >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 15:57:02 UTC