- From: <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:28:58 -0400
- To: <jones@research.att.com>, <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, <kreger@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5C76D29CD0FA3143896D08BB1743296AB89BAA@bsebe001.americas.nokia.com>
Here is a diagram which better demonstrates p2p graphically. BR, Mike >-----Original Message----- >From: ext jones@research.att.com [mailto:jones@research.att.com] >Sent: September 23, 2002 01:57 PM >To: RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com; jones@research.att.com; >kreger@us.ibm.com >Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org >Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f > > > >I think the compromise would be to base most of the initial discussion >around the simple, unadorned triangle, laying out the range of >possibilities >in the text. The elaborated diagrams should either reflect a union of >the abstractions and/or instantiations in the space or should reflect >a particular architectural style. I would be comfortable with >the former >if it doesn't make things too confusing, but would gladly accept the >latter. > >--mark > >Mark A. Jones >AT&T Labs >Shannon Laboratory >Room 2A-02 >180 Park Ave. >Florham Park, NJ 07932-0971 > >email: jones@research.att.com >phone: (973) 360-8326 > fax: (973) 236-6453 > > From RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com Mon Sep 23 13:45 EDT 2002 > Delivered-To: jones@research.att.com > X-Authentication-Warning: mail-pink.research.att.com: >postfixfilter set sender to RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com using -f > X-Server-Uuid: EE520CAE-7FCA-4D2A-A2DC-297BA4A725CC > From: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" ><RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com> > To: "'Mark Jones'" <jones@research.att.com>, > "Heather Kreger" <kreger@us.ibm.com> > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: arch diagrams from the f2f > Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 10:44:36 -0700 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-WSS-ID: 11918CF6275166-01-01 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20 > > I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually >to restrict web > services to one messaging pattern. No matter what the >words might say in > the text, I think that having pictures that leave this >impression would not > be good. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Jones [mailto:jones@research.att.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:50 PM > To: Heather Kreger > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f > > > Heather, > > I added 3 slides at the end of the set that you sent >out. I rearranged > and simplified the boxes and labels a bit. I also >began to append > concrete technology labels on some of the boxes. (I >just made a cursory > pass at this to see what it would look like. Feel free >to further flesh > it out.) At least while we are deciding on the correct >set of boxes and > labels, I think it helps to identify them. > > Mark Jones > AT&T > > > Heather Kreger wrote: > > > > > > > > >Hi folks, Here are the architecture diagrams I drafted >up during our > >meeting today. I have some words for some of this >stuff that I will > >align and send to the group as soon as > >humanly possible. > > > >(See attached file: w3cStack.ppt) > > > >I have permission from IBM to submit both this stack >and the origional > >triangle to the W3C for inclusion into the architecture and > >modification by the working group. > > > >Heather Kreger > >Web Services Lead Architect > >STSM, SWG Emerging Technology > >kreger@us.ibm.com > >919-543-3211 (t/l 441) cell:919-496-9572 > > > > > >
Attachments
- application/vnd.ms-powerpoint attachment: w3cStack.p2p.ppt
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 15:29:16 UTC