- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:46:52 -0400
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:23:15AM -0400, Champion, Mike wrote: > What we can do is find the *intersection* of the architectural principles in > various specs and proposals, and those that are actually succeeding in > practice. Correct me if I'm wrong Mike, but I think what you're saying here is that you want to look at the features/capabilities of the specifications and find their intersection, not so much the architectural principles and/or assumptions made by those specs. I can see value to the former interpretation, but not so much with the latter, for some of the reasons given at the end of this message; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002May/0386 Or in other words, the more you intersect architectural principles, the closer you'll get to the "null style" (as Roy calls it) that has no constraints and is therefore "good for nothing". 8-) I agree with the rest of your message though. Sometime I lose sight of our role in the bigger picture, and get more excited than I should about something of little consequence. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 14:47:37 UTC