- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:21:29 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFDF31754B.270920E1-ON85256C48.00435BDC-85256C48.0043C600@rchland.ibm.com>
+1 Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624 www-ws-arch-request@w3.org wrote on 10/04/2002 07:58:09 AM: > > "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes: > > - second block of text just below Figure 2, > > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure > call > > (RPC) oriented interaction style" > > > > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to > > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should > > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for > > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document > style > > instead of RPC. > > +1 > > I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely > change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to > reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC. > > Sanjiva. > >
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 08:22:06 UTC