- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:58:09 +0600
- To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "'Newcomer, Eric'" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes: > - second block of text just below Figure 2, > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure call > (RPC) oriented interaction style" > > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document style > instead of RPC. +1 I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC. Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 07:59:55 UTC