- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:43:17 +0900
- To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: Heather Kreger <kreger@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org, Herve Ruellan <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
* Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr> [2002-10-01 15:37+0200] > Heather, > > Overall, this[0] looks good. I have some comments regarding the > SOAP description. [..] Excellent clarifications, Jean-Jacques. > Heather Kreger wrote: > >Here is the words I have for the wire stack. Same caveats as before. > > > >(See attached file: wire.ZIP) > > --------------------- > "The current industry standard for XML packaging is the Simple > Object Access Protocol (SOAP)[SOAP 00]." > > Given that SOAP 1.2 is no longer an acronym (for which > no one has complained) -- and since I think you're really > talking about SOAP 1.1 at this point -- I'd suggest simply > saying: "SOAP 1.1 [SOAP 00]". > > "IBM, Microsoft and others submitted SOAP to the W3C" > > s/SOAP/SOAP 1.1/ > > "as the basis of the XML Protocol Working Group [XMLP 00]." > > I suggest adding: "The XMLP WG is in the final stages of > developping SOAP 1.2, the next version of SOAP.", which > then provides a good transition to the following > (amended) sentence: > > "Once complete, XML Protocol implementations will replace the > existing SOAP implementations as the industry standard XML > messaging protocol." > > s/XML Protocol/SOAP 1.2/ (The name of the protocol > is no longer XMLP [nor XP, as it used to be initially].) I don't think that it is worth talking about SOAP 1.1 here. The work on SOAP 1.2 is advanced enough to just replace the 1.1 prose by your 1.2 corrections. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 06:43:25 UTC