- From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 08:40:36 -0800
- To: "'Damodaran, Suresh'" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>, "'Austin, Daniel'" <Austin.D@ic.grainger.com>, "'michael.mahan@nokia.com'" <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
- cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
I am not aware of any fundamental inconsistency between the goal of using the web for business purposes and those of the semantic web. Frankly, I would be surprised and disappointed if the semantic web goals were in some way incompatible with using the web for business. If there are any such inconsistencies I agree that they should be documented. -----Original Message----- From: Damodaran, Suresh [mailto:Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:45 PM To: 'Austin, Daniel'; 'michael.mahan@nokia.com' Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: D-AG0009; Semantic Web & Web architecture Thanks, for the pointer - though I wasn't asking for a pointer. I had a different request below. Thanks, -Suresh -----Original Message----- From: Austin, Daniel [mailto:Austin.D@ic.grainger.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 PM To: Damodaran, Suresh; 'michael.mahan@nokia.com' Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: D-AG0009; Semantic Web & Web architecture Here is an initial pointer to some Semantic Web information at W3C: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ I think it's very important that we all understand this and take it into account in our architectural discussions. Regards, D- > -----Original Message----- > From: Damodaran, Suresh [mailto:Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:32 PM > To: 'michael.mahan@nokia.com' > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: D-AG0009; Semantic Web & Web architecture > > > > Per request during the call today 3/21: > > It is fine to think about the business goals and semantic web goals as > separate. However, to ensure that these are different goals, it would > seem logical to identify where the goals differ? I request an > enumeration of the fundamental attributes of these 2 goals > that might be in apparent contradiction. > > Thanks, > -Suresh > >
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 11:43:27 UTC