- From: Mahan Michael (NRC/Boston) <michael.mahan@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:50:10 -0500
- To: "ext Austin, Daniel" <Austin.D@ic.grainger.com>, "Timothy N. Jones" <tim@crossweave.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Austin, Daniel [mailto:Austin.D@ic.grainger.com] > Sent: March 22, 2002 06:22 PM > To: 'Timothy N. Jones'; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: D-AG0008: "is coherent and consistent in its definition" > > > One issue regarding this goal: this goal talks about > the definition > of the architecture, i.e. the reference architecture that we > define. This > reference architecture should be consistent and coherent. > This applies to > both the reference architecture itself and the document that > contains its > definition. > +1 This is the point I was attempting to make in the telecon and which I alluded to in [1]. "2. I think that this goal (11) is sufficiently exclusive relative to AG0008 ("is coherent and consistent in its definition"), at least the way I read AG0008. I believe (and can certainly be wrong here) that AG0008 talks to the way WS-A describes and models the reference architecture from a notation or syntactic perspective rather than whether the resultant definition is consistent with the existing web, which is the topic of this goal, AG0011. Please correct me if I am wrong, because then AG0008 and AG0011 should be combined, or one should be killed off or redefined." [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Mar/0181.html
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 10:50:48 UTC