- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:13:30 -0500 (EST)
- To: hugo@w3.org (Hugo Haas)
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org ('www-ws-arch@w3.org')
+1! > I believe that conformance testing will come to play for the > technologies designed by other Working Groups started as a result of > the work of the WSAWG. > > I am all for interoperability and interoperability testing, but I am > unclear how that could be achieved at the architectural level (I will > be happy to have this clarified though). It would be up to those > Working Groups to co-ordinate with people (WS-I and others) developing > test suites. > > I would therefore specify that AC0012-A is delegated to the Groups > developing the technologies, and therefore remove the mentioning of > the WSAWG in AC0121-A and replace "WS-I" by something more general > (anybody could come up with a test suite). > > In the end, I would maybe drop AC0121-A and rephrase AC0012-A: > > Ensures that the development of identified technologies identifies > conformance so that testing software can be constructed. > > This is a W3C-wide goal, but I guess that it's OK to repeat it. -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 20:08:38 UTC