- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 12:23:13 -0700
- To: David Orchard <david.orchard@bea.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Orchard [mailto:david.orchard@bea.com] > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:57 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."] > > > I agree with Dietmar. I see little difference between "web > resources" and > "web services" in Krishna's definition. I didn't see much discussion in response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Mar/0029.html . This described about 6 gradations between something that is clearly a "web resource" (a stock quote page directed at humans) and indisputably a "web service" (a SOAP message invoking an XML representation of the stock price, all described in WSDL). I'd be very curious to hear where other people would draw the line. For me, it's where the "contract" between the service provider and the service consumer becomes explicit and detailed enough so that a programmer could invoke the service and use the results, without any "AI" stuff, of course.
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 14:23:46 UTC