- From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:24:10 +1000
- To: "'Mark Hapner'" <mark.hapner@sun.com>, ws-arch-public <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 03:23:21 UTC
A conclusion: There is no technical reason why Soap cannot embrace and extend the existing web. It should; and, WSAWG should reinforce its commitment to this goal. <hh>There is a fundamental difference here between RPC (SOAP/WSDL is biased towards RPC) and REST. With RPC, state is internal and semantics are embedded in various method names and arguments. With REST, state is external (can be GET) and semantics are carried by URIs and their representations. (The verb-vs-noun arguments.) Unless there is a reconciliation between those two, the gap is quite wide. A simple solution might be giving up RPC in SOAP/WSDL altogether but lots of people will cry. </hh> Hao
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 03:23:21 UTC