- From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 11:15:45 -0700
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
That would be CORBA::Object :-) But *semantics* have to be specific to a component - always. The issue to resolve is how and where one learns these specifics and its relationship(s) to protocols and description languages. Martin. > Heh. 8-) But since IUnknown (or equivalent - I don't > remember the CORBA equivalent) can only be used to discover > the specific interface, and not *use* the service, > eventually, component-specific semantics are required to be > understood. Does that help? > > So, despite CORBA and COM having some generic methods, the > larger picture of a CORBA/COM connector is that semantics are > specific to the component. > > Thanks for the feedback. When we write this up, we should be > as specific as possible, and this should be reflected. We > could talk about how WSDL-over-GET, or WSIL, or other uses of > GET with Web services, are used in a similar way to > IUnknown/QueryInterface. > > MB > -- > Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org > http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com >
Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 14:16:48 UTC