- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 22:24:00 -0400
- To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 06:40:12PM -0700, Burdett, David wrote: > Does this make sense? I think that describes the typical waterfall model. But sometimes software happens without an architecture document, and at that point, the architecture *exists*, it just hasn't been written down. So maybe you start writing it down at some point, so that you have something to work from, to give you a base from which to reason about the value of particular extensions or uses/misuses. At least that's how I see it. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 22:11:48 UTC