- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:57:19 -0400
- To: "ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <zulah_eckert@hp.com>
- Cc: "WSA W3C Public (E-mail)" <www-ws-arch@w3c.org>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:03:24PM -0700, ECKERT,ZULAH (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > At the WSAWG 7/11/02 meeting [2], AC019 [1] was partially approved. The > following draft requirements from AC019 were not approved: > > D-AR019.1.1 Web Services Architecture will enable discovery of a relocated > Web Service. I'm ok with this one, but FWIW, it could be said to be a subset of the requirement I championed to define or identify an interface that all Web services can offer (I don't think we have a number for this one yet). So it could be removed, or maybe moved under it. Just a thought. > D-AR019.1.3 Web Services Architecture will incorporate support for reliable > messaging. I've made my objections well known. Here's some alternatives I could live with; .. will not preclude support for reliable messaging .. will support the ability for components to reliably coordinate tasks over an unreliable network. This may include solutions such as reliable messaging, the definition of a coordination language, other as-yet-unidentified solutions, or some combination thereof. Basically, I'd like the wording to not imply that the best way in which to achieve reliability over a network, is to ensure that every message is delivered reliably. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 15:45:17 UTC