- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:42:10 -0400
- To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
- Cc: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Burdett, David wrote: > Mike > > I total agree that a WSA that only built on RPC would not be accepted, as > you say below. Perhaps a definition of "RPC" would be helpful. If you look at Xmethods.net, they break Web services down into two types; document, and RPC. But even the document types are RPC, at least by my definition, and the definition I understand Mike to be using. The rule of thumb I've used is; if there is a method name in the SOAP envelope, then it's RPC. Because when SOAP is used with an application protocol, the method comes from the protocol. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 12:30:26 UTC