- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:48:58 -0700
- To: "Narahari, Sateesh" <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
"Narahari, Sateesh" wrote: > > > > Why would you give out addresses on www.myhomeaddress.com without > > coordination? There are a hundred simple solutions to the > > problem. After > > all, the URI namespace is infinite. You could subdivide it in any of a > > thousand ways. Each process could embed their PID in the URI. Each > > *object* could embed a pointer address in the URI. Each process could > > have its own IP address or domain. > > Exactly. Coordination is required, and REST as an architectural style does > not provide support for this coordination ( as per my understanding ), The person running the www.myhomeaddress.com server needs merely to set up a policy and require services running on that machine to adhere to the policy. The sharing of resources (ports, URIs) on a single machine is far outside the scope of the W3C. -- Come discuss XML and REST web services at: Open Source Conference: July 22-26, 2002, conferences.oreillynet.com Extreme Markup: Aug 4-9, 2002, www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/
Received on Tuesday, 16 July 2002 17:49:55 UTC