- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:32:02 -0400
- To: "Damodaran, Suresh" <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi, On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:07:04PM -0500, Damodaran, Suresh wrote: > Therefore, I do not see how changing "reliable messaging" to "reliable > computing" > improves the clarity. It wasn't intended to improve the clarity, it was intended to resolve my belief that it is inappropriate for us to prescribe a specific solution (such as reliable messaging) until we know the form that our architecture will take. > Besides, "reliable computing" includes defining semantics of what is > "reliable" computing. > Refer to "behavior equivalence definition" thread discussions. How about "reliable coordination of tasks" then? MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 21:20:42 UTC