- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 00:26:05 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: michael.mahan@nokia.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Dave, On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 04:59:02PM -0800, David Orchard wrote: > I'm dubious about the success factors. They seem to be an attempt to > summarize the principles of the web architecture from an "ilities" and a > technical spec perspective. These things are up to the TAG to > document/define. I would suggest that the critical success factors should > be more along the lines of: > > CF1: The Web Services reference architecture complies with the architectural > principals and design goals of the Web: > CF1-A: as defined by the work products that the TAG produces that define the > web architecture. I like Mike's success factors, but I understand that we probably should be referencing the TAG's work. What if we said that those success factors should be used until the TAG publishes its view? I don't know ther schedule, so maybe you could fill us in as to whether this is necessary. MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com
Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 00:20:39 UTC