- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 22:20:30 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 21:19 +0100 5/8/04, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Dan Brickley wrote: >> I would be happy to also add OWL's namespace text into this, so that >> translators do OWL too. However, OWL http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl >>has only labels, not comments. Are there non-controversial short >>pieces >> of text that we could add into this namespace and its translations, for >> each OWL class, property, etc? >> > >IIRC the answer is "no". rdfs:comment *is* controversial in this >working group, which is why we deleted them. (Since it is not >controversial in the RDF Core WG, you can tell that I and some >others are not the source of the issues). I guess I should try and >find some messages in the archive, how about a beer in NY instead? > >Jeremy I think rdfs:comment became less controversial when we invented annotation properties - would anyone who onjected to comments before still object? I have had several people ask me about comments in the namespace document, and I wonder if this wouldn't now be an easy thing to do ... JH -- Professor James Hendler http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Saturday, 8 May 2004 22:24:20 UTC