- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 01:51:29 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, Eva Méndez <emendez@bib.uc3m.es>
Thanks for reminding me. I cleaned up my spanish version of the rdf/rdfs schema (thanks to Eva Mendez for her help some weeks ago) and published it at http://www.w3.org/2000/01/combined-ns-translation.rdf.es I'd be happy to do the Spanish version for the OWL namespace - it's probably even easier than the RDF/S one, and I would expect to be able to publish it next week. But as Dan says, a short commentary text would be very helpful. I also translate labels into real text phrases, rather than camelCase expressions - those are for the computer to wrestle with, IMHO. If I get through the RDF Primer, Eva has said she would pass to the Schema (to update her translation of the old draft to the new Recommendation), and I would be looking for something new. So far I don't think anyone has put their hand up for OWL, but I want to get more practice with OWL anyway, so... Cheers Chaals On Fri, 7 May 2004 18:26:38 -0400, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> wrote: > * Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org> [2004-05-08 00:04+0200] >> >> Pat Hayes wrote: >> Indeed. And if anyone ever hears of a Spanish version, please let us >> know about it ASAP. >> >> Pat >> > One brief point to add re translations. The RDF and RDFS namespace URis > have rdfs:seeAlso pointers which link to a table of contents RDF 'page' > which in turn links to translations of the rdfs:label and rdfs:comment > text for RDF and RDFS namespaces. At the current time, only French, but > there is at least Spanish (via Charles) and German in progress. See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2004Mar/0258.html > for pointers. > > To make translation easier, I combined both RDF and RDFS content into a > single document. > http://www.w3.org/2000/01/combined-ns-translation.rdf.fr is an example > translation. > > I would be happy to also add OWL's namespace text into this, so that > translators do OWL too. However, OWL http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl > has only labels, not comments. Are there non-controversial short pieces > of text that we could add into this namespace and its translations, for > each OWL class, property, etc?
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 19:52:27 UTC