- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 18:09:50 -0400
- To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov, www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 14:55 -0400 5/7/04, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >In message >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2004Apr/0012.html >Jeremy Carroll noted that the QA WG had taken our comments on their >specifications very seriously and that WebOnt should accept their >response. I second this suggestion. They seem to have embraced our >comments and are making major changes in response. I hope that webont >can respond formally with our thanks for and gratitude for taking such >positive actions on our comments. > >-Evan OK, this has been moved by Jeremy and seconded by Evan, and I've not yet seen any objections. I propose we do this as an email consensus call: RESOLVED: The Web Ontology Working Group accepts the response of the QA WG to our comments. ACTION: JimH to delegate to someone (likely Evan or Jeremy) to convey our response to the QA WG including the thanks that Evan mentions above. PROCESS: If I hear no objections by midnight (EST) of May 13th (2 weeks from Jeremy's original post) then we will accept this as consensus. If anyone who is a member in good standing of the Working Group raises an objection, then we will schedule a telecon to discuss it and/or go to a WBS vote prior to the end of the Working Group's charter. -- Professor James Hendler http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 18:39:45 UTC