- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:33:08 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Dom wrote: > Thanks for your thoughtful and extensive comments [1] on the CR > specifications of the QA Framework (QAF). We are expediting and > accelerating responses to your comments so that you may consider the > responses before your charter expires in the near future. > I hope we can manage to formally reply. > Your comments resulted in the queuing of 26 specific issues, > > CR-1: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues#x1 > consecutively through > CR-26: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/cr-issues#x26 > I have looked through these individual issue resolutions, and they all seem acceptable to me; I have also effectively withdrawn my further personal comments on QAF. Ideally we would review the planned new documents, but they will not be available until after we have closed down. > At each of these issues, you will see the resolved closure by QAWG, > "Resolution". To make a long story short, we pretty much agreed with > all of your comments, as stated in the resolution of CR-1: > > "The QA Framework is being redesigned for simplicity, clarity, > usefulness, and usability. There will be fewer documents, they will be > smaller and simpler, less authoritarian, and well syncrhonized with each > other. For details, see: f2f minutes [2], TP2004 presentation [3], QAIG > announcement [4], and W3C Chairs announcement [5]. For ongoing > implementation of resolution, see QAF status on QAWG home page." > > [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/03/f2f-minutes#minutes-1pm > [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/tp2004-test-pc/ > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Mar/0027.html > [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2004JanMar/0100.html > (Member-only) I would be happy to propose that we accept the QAWG's response to our comments. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2004 05:33:46 UTC