Re: please review staging drafts

thanks for the work .
that html diff is a convenient mechanism for viewing changes.
The updates you made to features/overview look fine (and i also have no 
issues with the updates to the other documents on which I am an author 
or editor.)



Sandro Hawke wrote:

>I think the staging drafts [1] are just what the RECs will be
>(director willing), except for:
>     - search/replace of staging URIs
>     - removing the Pre-Publication Warning
>     - any of the changes being talked about (probably today)
>There are HTML diffs between the PR documents and these documents at:
>Among the changes I made:
>  - insertion of Status of this Document
>  - change encodings from iso-8859-1 to utf-8 (new w3c default)
>  - copyright to 2004
>  - add links to translation database and errata page
>  - set publication date of 10-Feb
>The RDF Core documents are not so far along yet.
>PLEASE let me know asap if you find any problems with these documents!
>Thanks.   :-)    By the way, by Mozilla's count, these docs total 224
>pages not including the test case data, or 942 pages with test data.
>     -- sandro

 Deborah L. McGuinness 
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory 
 353 Serra Mall
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)  801 705 0941

Received on Thursday, 29 January 2004 19:52:12 UTC