- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:09:48 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, pfps@research.bell-labs.com
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> I attach the test data as a zip.
>
> Summary of results.
The tests and results are now clearer at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0065/
The description omits the namespace (rdf: rdfs: or owl:).
My understanding is that the Jena results are correct except for those for
tests involving rdf:_2 where there is often a bug. e.g.
the lines from the table:
imports as ObjectProperty Full Lite FULL
and
_2 as OntologyProperty Lite Unknown FULL
consider the test graphs:
{
owl:imports rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty .
}
and
{
rdf:_2 rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty .
}
Jena and Wonderweb correctly identify the first as Full.
WonderWeb correctly finds the second as full.
(Pellet gets close - with an error message of some sort), Jena is wrong.
Clicking on any of the descriptions gives you the test data (I have used
xml:base in the test area merely to work better with my test harness).
Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 14:10:02 UTC