- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:11:43 -0600
- To: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 12:47, Deborah L. McGuinness wrote: > i am getting questions from people who are confused because of the > december dates in the references on the web ont pages > (all of the documens state proposed rec and dec 15 on te main page - > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ > > also, there is no mention on current events of recommendation status . > > could someone make an update to reflect the feb 10 dates (and a mention > of our rec status would be nice as well). OK, I updated it... $Revision: 1.293 $ of $Date: 2004/02/19 22:17:35 $ Keep in mind that the page is about and for the WG; I update it as often as I need to for WG business, i.e. every week or two. (Jim and Sandro occasionally tweak it too.) The place to point people for up-to-the minute tech report status is http://www.w3.org/TR/ and the W3C home page (http://www.w3.org/) tracks high level news on a daily/weekly basis too. The Semantic Web page has a news section too... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ It tracks OWL specs with pretty low latency too. Jim and Guus and I have been talking about an outward-facing OWL homepage, ala http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/ or http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema That sort of thing can be very valuable, but it can also be a challenge to meet expectations once you say "this is the place for OWL news!" I lean toward community-maintained resources like http://esw.w3.org/topic/OwlTalks but I haven't convinced Jim and others that we should use that for OWL news and such. > > thanks, > deborah -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the W3C Tech Plenary in Cannes 1-5 Mar 2003?
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 18:11:14 UTC