- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:11:29 -0500
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:06, Jim Hendler wrote: [...] > This makes me nervous as both S&AS and Test are supposed to be > normative, and they seem to disagree. To me, it's a feature, not a bug, that we have redundant specs and we're finding niggling details where they disagree, but... > 2 - > > There are a very small number of tests that have not yet been passed - > however, two of them are: > > [Results] miscellaneous-001 levels:DL, Full [APPROVED: Med L XXL] > Wine example taken from the guide. > > [Results] miscellaneous-002 levels:DL, Full [APPROVED: Med L XXL] Food > example taken from the guide. > > both of which are DL tests taken from examples from the Guide. In > the worst case we could always make the tests extra credit or simply > change the Guide a bit -- but as Chair it concerns me that a document > created by our own WG to be an example of a typical use of OWL is > generating a test that none of our reasoners seem to be able to pass. I noticed that a few times, and I'm very curious, if not concerned. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 19:15:29 UTC