RE: Guide: Text in Appendix C: An Alternative Region Ontology

> Appendix C is a bit of an old remnant, which would serve better as a 
> guideline / how-to-do-it example.

Makes sense to me.  I will do so, unless there is a
uproar from the WG.

- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Guus Schreiber [mailto:schreiber@cs.vu.nl] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:36 AM
To: Smith, Michael K
Cc: webont
Subject: Re: Guide: Text in Appendix C: An Alternative Region Ontology


Smith, Michael K wrote:

> Guus,
> 
> We have the following in the Guide:
> 
> 
>>Below is a UML class diagram for this example. The modeling decisions
>>for this diagram will be discussed in the forthcoming document on the
>>UML presentation syntax. 
> 
> 
> Should I leave this as 'the forthcoming document' or do we have 
> something to point to?  Or 'a forthcoming document'?

Appendix C is a bit of an old remnant, which would serve better as a 
guideline / how-to-do-it example. Also, the UML presentation will be 
overruled by the OMG UML profile. Thus, I propose to delelet appedix C 
from the Guide, which I think can be done without loss of info.

Guus

> 
> - Mike
> 
> Michael K. Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
> EDS - Austin Innovation Centre
> 98 San Jacinto, #500
> Austin, TX  78701
> 
> phone: +01-512-404-6683
> email: michael.smith@eds.com
>   

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2003 11:00:03 UTC