- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:55:08 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Peter: > Yuck. > There is a (two-part) solution. While not yet having understood your solution, I will suggest a different one for your consideration. Add the constraint to section 5 that in every rdfs compatible owl interpretation the class extension of owl:Ontology is non-empty. (Horrid hack?). We can't count this things in OWL DL so non-empty should suffice. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 11:55:13 UTC