Peter: > Yuck. > There is a (two-part) solution. While not yet having understood your solution, I will suggest a different one for your consideration. Add the constraint to section 5 that in every rdfs compatible owl interpretation the class extension of owl:Ontology is non-empty. (Horrid hack?). We can't count this things in OWL DL so non-empty should suffice. JeremyReceived on Monday, 22 September 2003 11:55:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:04:49 UTC