- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:52 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> 1) It would be good if someone could extract a list of proposed tests with
> one or more systems that pass them, ideally with the list of systems next to
> each test. We could then use that as the basis to approve a load of tests.
Done. Now on the page.
> 2) I do not think that Peter's system should be viewed as passing all the
> syntactic tests.
> In particular it does not distinguish OWL Lite from OWL DL.
>
> I would suggest marking the OWL Lite Syntax tests as Incompletely passed by
> Peter's system.
Peter, do you agree? Do you plan on maintaining the data, or should
someone just do this one-time change?
> 3)
> I note that the five approved tests that we are not passing suggests that we
> approved them rather too quickly.
We still don't have results on the page from FaCT, Racer, Cerebra,
Jena, ... etc.
-- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2003 13:03:03 UTC