- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:17:48 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > I've written a python program to fetch one or more RDF files > describing OWL test-suite test results and output a table showing the > combined details . You can view the output at > > http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out > > Down at the bottom, you'll see there's a form where you can supply > your own URIs for RDF data about your own test results, and see what > it makes of them, running as a CGI script. My thought is that when > someone has a stable page of test results for some system, we'll > include it in the default set; alternatively, I could just pick up > results from the public-webont-comments archives, so we know exactly > what we're presenting. > > Right now it just has two different result sets from my reasoner, so > that you can see the multi-column layout. > > Anyway, take a look, offer suggestions, let me know all the ways it > breaks. (No, it's not actually doing any ontology query reasoning > yet; and No, I haven't actually written an ontology for the test > results format. Not yet.) Sandro - I've put up the results from my first order experiments at [1]. Those tests not attempted due to data types (marked as unsupported in my detailed results) are listed as Incomplete. To make it easier to refer to things, I have given the FO-based reasoner the code-name "Hoolet"* Sean [1] http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/hoolet-results.rdf * A Scots name for an OWL. Also I believe used to described somebody behaving foolishly. Seemed somehow appropriate. -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 06:18:05 UTC