- From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:16:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: >Technically speaking, the QA action below can only be continued >if we decided that 0113 was an incomplete record of the >9 Oct meeting. Perhaps we decided to ammend the 9 Oct record >to show an action on Evan W. and Jeremy C. and then to continue >that action. Hmm... I don't see any record of QA discussion >in the 9 Oct telcon at all. Nor 2 Oct. For some reason, record of your action and any follow on meeting items fell off the agendas for the last couple of meetings. Jeremy and I had discussed the QA OPS feedback in email, though. We had planned to get back to this week anyway. >Not that it really matters much to life as we know it; but I hope >that we'll eventually keep formal meeting records and that the >machine will be more helpful in preparing agendas and keeping >track of actions. See > http://esw.w3.org/topic/MeetingRecords Another area where a simple tool could help is with holding and recording roll call votes. There are fairly simple constraints on this and much of the related static data is already recorded in wg webpage. With the attendance list that Zakim has, it should be possible to tell if a meeting is quorate. Then tell the vote taker which member rep. should be polled for each member or in some cases provide the list of reps who are candidate voters for that member organization. This is a comparatively weak use of logic based tools in a standards meeting context, but it would be nice to have and a good small demonstration of the SW. -Evan
Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 11:16:24 UTC