Review of RDF Concepts Document

I have reviewed the RDF LC2 Document "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"

Changes since the last version were:

IRIs     Excluded control characters from RDF URI References. 
Added note in same section, permitting implementors to read and 
partially act on IRI-draft.     Added informative reference to IRI 
draft. NFC     Weakened the language concerning Normal Form C from 
MUST to SHOULD, as agreed on 3rd October. Appendix B.2: Editorial 
Revisions More NFC     Added text in section 3.4 Literals suggesting 
reading Charmod


I have reviewed these changes and believe that they are consistent 
with our expectations, do not introduce issues for OWL, and add no 
new problems.  I therefore propose that we submit the following:

The Web Ontology Working Group has reviewed the Concepts and Abstract 
Syntax Document.  The language design is consistent with our design 
of OWL, and the document is well-written.  We have no negative 
comments about this document and believe it is a valuable 
contribution to the RDF document set.


-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***