- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:34:07 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Dan - it wasn't, but Jeremy has put your testcase [[ <otest:PositiveEntailmentTest rdf:ID='test'> <rtest:status>PROPOSED</rtest:status> <dc:creator>Dan Connolly</dc:creator> <rtest:issue rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues#I5.8-Datatypes' /> <otest:level rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology#Full' /> <otest:supportedDatatype rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal'/> <rtest:description rdf:parseType='Literal'> This explores aliases of builtin datatypes.</rtest:description> <rtest:premiseDocument> <rtest:RDF-XML-Document rdf:about='premises017' > <otest:level rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology#Full' /> </rtest:RDF-XML-Document> </rtest:premiseDocument> <rtest:conclusionDocument> <rtest:RDF-XML-Document rdf:about='conclusions017' > <otest:level rdf:resource='http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology#Full' /> </rtest:RDF-XML-Document> </rtest:conclusionDocument> </otest:PositiveEntailmentTest > ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/I5.8/Manifest017 in the test suite which should complete your action. -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> To: Jos De_Roo/AMDUS/MOR/Agfa-NV/BE/BAYER@AGFA Sent by: cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Brian McBride www-webont-wg-req <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org uest@w3.org Subject: Re: testing that RDF datatypes can have more than one URI name 2003-10-10 03:50 PM Is this now in the OWL test suite? I don't really know where to look. I'd like to tell RDF Core that my action is done. On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 08:20, Jos De_Roo wrote: > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > > > > Here is a QName triples version (translate as appropriate for RDF/XML) > > > > xsd:decimal owl:sameAs ex:bar . > > ex:xx ex:yy "01^^ex:bar . > > I had trouble parsing the last triple, but > ex:xx ex:yy "01"^^ex:bar . > worked better ;-) > > > owl full entails > > > > ex:xx ex:yy "1"^^xsd:decimal . > > > > because ex:bar and xsd:decimal have the same denotation and thus have the > > same L2V mapping. > > > > Note that this only depends on the datatype map mapping xsd:decimal to > the > > XSD decimal type, and does not depend on ex:bar being in the datatype > map. > > I again had trouble to infer that, but this time due to > a shortcoming in our implementation of the substitution > of equals-for-equals; I made a trial change and then > it worked (but I have to eventually reconsider it). > > jos > > > peter -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 19:34:19 UTC