- From: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:24:16 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
We also think this is an excellent idea. > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:20 AM > To: Sean Bechhofer > Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: Test Results Organisation > > > > From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk> > Subject: Test Results Organisation > Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:42:48 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) > > > > > > > A while ago I raised the possibility of splitting the > display of test > > results to take into account the different species levels > as well as the > > approved/proposed status [1]. This would have the benefit > of making it > > easier to identify whether implementations targeting a particular > > language species were on track (and determining whether, > for example, an > > implementation provides a substantial subset of DL [cf. > exit criterion > > 4]). > > > > I would have thought this would be relatively easy to do as the > > information is all there in the manifests. Can I propose that we > > make this change? > > > > Sean > > > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0130.html > > > > -- > > Sean Bechhofer > > seanb@cs.man.ac.uk > > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb > > > I think that this as an excellent idea. > > peter > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:24:32 UTC