- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:41:40 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
After discussion within HP .... === HP developers are surprised that the tests from the OWL Guide are not being passed by any systems. We are particularly concerned since the comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0046 "have long CR period for OWL, or move owl:oneOf, owl: have Value to OWL Full" alerted the Working Group to our fears in this area, and the reply http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0023 particularly [[ The WG has been made aware of implementations of OWL DL that include both inverseOf and oneOf and which seem to be performing well in practice. The working group will definitely consider their status and usability before deciding on our schedule with respect to Candidate Recommendation and Proposed Recommendation. ]] seemed to suggest that the potential problem was under control. Since this seems to have been mistaken, we request that discussion of the Last Call comment from Martin Merry be reopened. Jeremy Carroll, HP
Received on Monday, 6 October 2003 13:01:09 UTC