- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:10:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Here is wording that I suggested for RDF, that I think could be easily adapted to describe owl.owl. Note that there are two pieces here, the second of which should be an XML comment in the actual file (and, of course, in all textual representations thereof). peter Appendix A: Partial Description of RDF Schema Vocabulary in RDF/XML A partial RDF description of some of the RDF Core vocabulary is given here in RDF/XML serialization syntax. This RDF schema includes statements about RDF resources originally introduced by the 1999 RDF Model and Syntax specification, as well as statements about resources introduced in the RDF Core Schema vocabulary. The information given here neither complete nor valid. For example, there is no information about the RDF container membership properties or about RDF datatyping. Further, the information concerning rdfs:comment, rdfs:label, rdfs:isDefinedBy, and rdfs:seeAlso relationships is not entailed by an empty RDF graph. Nonetheless the information could be used by tools as a source of some information about some vocabulary elements. Please note that the namespace URI for the RDF Schema vocabulary could change in future versions of this specification. This RDF/XML is also available as a separate RDF/XML document (rdfs-namespace.xml). It is not currently published at the W3C RDF Schema namespace URI. ----------------------------------------------------- <!-- A partial RDF description of some of the RDF Core vocabulary is given here in RDF/XML serialization syntax. This RDF schema includes statements about RDF resources originally introduced by the 1999 RDF Model and Syntax specification, as well as statements about resources introduced in the RDF Core Schema vocabulary. The information given here neither complete nor valid. For example, there is no information about the RDF container membership properties or about RDF datatyping. Further, the information concerning rdfs:comment, rdfs:label, rdfs:isDefinedBy, and rdfs:seeAlso relationships is not entailed by an empty RDF graph. Nonetheless the information could be used by tools as a source of some information about some vocabulary elements. -->
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 13:11:08 UTC