- From: Thompson, Lynne R <Lynne.Thompson@unisys.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:59:48 -0600
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>, WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
UNABLE TO ATTEND DUE TO A MEETING CONFLICT -----Original Message----- From: Guus Schreiber [mailto:schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:12 AM To: WebOnt WG Subject: WOWG: agenda March 13 telecon WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP AGENDA/LOGISTICS March 13, 2003 1200 US East Coast 0900 US West Coast 1700 London 0200 Tokyo (next day) Duration: 60-90 minutes PHONE INFORMATION To use Zakim: Dial +1.617.761.6200 At the "enter your passcode followed by the pound key" message, enter 9326#. Note: When you join the telecon please state your name CHAT INFO Simultaneous IRC Chat irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665) #webont Chair: Guus Schreiber Scribe: Herman ter Horst 1) ADMIN (10-15 min) 1.1 Role Call Regrets: Hendler, Obrst, Wallace See list archive for last-minute regrets 1.2 Approval of Minutes of last telecon PROPOSED to accept the following as a true record of Feb 27: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0402.html 1.3 Agenda Amendments 1.4 Telecon Schedule Next telecon: March 20 Scribe: TBD 2 ISSUE & ISSUETTES (30-35 min) 2.1 ISSUE 5.26 OWL DL Syntax Context: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html#I5.26-OWLDLSyntax PROPOSAL to RESOLVE [consensus from editors meetings]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066.html See also message from Peter about new S&AS editor's draft: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0064.html ACTIONS from editors meeting: ACTION Peter, Jeremy: Check the "no acylicity constraint" in owl:disjointWith ACTION Peter, Jeremy: review rdf:first and rdf:rest in annotations ACTION Peter: remove restrictions with n=0 DONE ACTION: Guus: remove subProperty relationship between owl:priorVersion and owl:backwardsCompatibleWith and owl:incompatibleWith DONE ACTION: Guus: correct ontology domain and range constraints for owl:imports in owl.owl. DONE ACTION: Jeremy: generate domain and range constraints test cases for owl:imports ACTION Peter: check modifying rdf exclusion to a list of excluded items. ACTION Peter and Jeremy: discuss unnamed individuals. DONE Discussed netween Peter and Jeremy: proposed to disallow them in sameAs and differentFrom statements. ACTION: Peter" allow optional objectProperty typing for special categories of object properties. ACTION: Peter, Jeremy: Peter to add triple table of Jeremy's after Jeremy updates. ACTION: Peter/Ian. Check whther naming enumerated datatypes generates problems ACTION: Guus. Add words to reference if change. 2.2 XMLLieteral in OWL DL Issuette by Carroll: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0488.html Request to RDF Core: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0076.html Discussiopn notes at editors meeting (see Item 3): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0038.html Reasons againts from Volz: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0035.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0039.html 2.3 owl.owl Message from Guus: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0068.html Replies from Hendler, Carroll: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0071.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0069.html Message from public comments list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Mar/0006.html Discussion topics: - is owl.owl normative? - explicit import expected? - different versions for OWL Full/DL/Lite? - use OWL to define OWL? 3. DOCUMENT STATUS (30-35 min.) For all docs discuss: - status & outstanding actions - editing/review effort required for LC ACTION all editors: include member list in ack section http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Feb/0223.html 3.1 Use Cases and Requiremnents http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~heflin/webont/reqdoc/ 3.2 Overview http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLFeatureSynopsis.htm ACTION: Deb to add a paragraph on RDFS vs. OWL Lite to Overview doc. 3.3 Guide http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/Guide.html ACTION: pfps to send Mike S. answer re: anootation questions 3.4 Reference ACTION: Jeremy/HP review Reference ACTION: Evan and Mike Dean to take MIME type and produce MIME type doc ACTION: Jeremy to update discussion of relation between RDFS and OWL Lite, give quick comments. ACTION: Guus to review, add to the Reference document as Appendix. ACTION: Jim, Pat to review 3.5 S&AS http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/owl/ 3.6 Test Cases ACTION: Ian will look at section 4.2.2 of Test editor's draft and propose some wording for what is expected of datatypes DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0045.html 3.7 Planning for LC - strawpoll on LC decision - timeline ofr LC Candidates 4. AOB (0-5 min.) -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 12:01:42 UTC