- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:18:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I see that Raphael has inadvertently produced a good example of why RDF containers are problematic. peter From: "Raphael Volz" <volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de> Subject: 3 Reasons for not having XMLLiteral in DL Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:00:34 -0500 [...] > 1) Usability aspect: Increase of modelling alternatives [...] > 2) Nesting RDF [...] > 4) Argument of opening OWL to multitude of other XML technologies > is "broken" (to speak in PPS terminology) [...]
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:19:06 UTC