Re: Changes to make S&AS consistent with RDF Semantics document

>> >Can you name one of these tests, or all of them if it's convenient?
>> >
>> Doing a text search on the extra large version of Test reveals
>> that the phrase XMLLiteral appears only in tests 201 to 205.
>> 205 speaks of Full and a datatype map without XMLLiteral -
>> which is impossible under Possible Solution 1
>> 201 and 202 include the case of Full and a datatype map
>> without XMLLiteral - again impossible under Possible Solution 1.
> But would they switch entailment/consistency by having XMLLiteral?

The test case manifest is explicit w.r.t. datatype support.
In a RDFCore test case manifest one says
  eg:yourTest test:datatypeSupport rdf:XMLLiteral.

and in an OWL test case manifest one says
  :hisTest otest:supportedDatatype rdf:XMLLiteral.

and the latter is even explicit w.r.t. no datatype support
  :herTest otest:notSupportedDatatype rdf:XMLLiteral.

The RDFCore and OWL test cases illustrate the designissues
to my satisfaction.

Jos De Roo, AGFA

Received on Saturday, 13 December 2003 06:57:37 UTC