- From: <herman.ter.horst@philips.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:39:25 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, sandro@roke.hawke.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org
> >> >*Possible solution 1*: no changes to RDF Semantics, and two >> >"local" changes to S&AS: >> >-1a: add OWL DL semantics without XMLLiteral by means of a >> >detour via the abstract syntax (details below) >> >-1b: exclude the possibility of having OWL Full without >> >XMLLiteral semantics (after all, OWL Full is *OWL Full*) >> > >> >In view of 1b, this would not solve the problem completely, but >> >perhaps this would be acceptable? >> >In addition, 1b would require a small change in OWL Reference. >> Actually, 1b does not describe a change in S&AS, since S&AS as it >> is does already include XMLLiteral semantics in OWL Full. >> However, 1b does lead to changes to make Test consistent. >> For clarity, I list the other change required when this >> solution is taken: >> -1c: remove all tests that allow OWL Full without XMLLiteral >> semantics > >Can you name one of these tests, or all of them if it's convenient? > > -- sandro > Doing a text search on the extra large version of Test reveals that the phrase XMLLiteral appears only in tests 201 to 205. 205 speaks of Full and a datatype map without XMLLiteral - which is impossible under Possible Solution 1 201 and 202 include the case of Full and a datatype map without XMLLiteral - again impossible under Possible Solution 1. Herman
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 15:40:01 UTC