- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:35:18 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org, "Minsu Jang" <minsu@etri.re.kr>, evren@cs.umd.edu, "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, jack.berkowitz@networkinference.com
If OWL progresses to Proposed Recommendation, as I hope it will do very soon, the member companies will be asked to consider whether OWL should become a W3C Recommendation. They will be given a link to the OWL Test Results page [1] as evidence of wide implementation, so the more green on the page, the better the prospects for OWL. I just noticed that only one feed (Bossam) has been updated since the changes to the editor's test suite [2] on 4 December. Those changes were mostly involved Proposed tests, so I don't expect any surprises, but I think it would still be a very good idea to re-run the tests. I also hope some OWL implementation have improved. We have a few 100% columns on the reasoning tests; it would be nice to see a lot more. The target date for PR was three days ago, and we obviously didn't make it, but it might still happen very soon. So there's some urgency here. Improvements in the weeks to come would still be useful, of course. If you know someone producing data who I missed on the "To" field, or who might not be reading their e-mail today, please try to let them know. If there's a possibility that your system has regressed on some tests, feel free to use a different URL for the new results, so you or I can easily see the differences. Just let me know the new URL, of course. -- sandro [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/Manifest.rdf
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 10:39:49 UTC