- From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:03:19 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
- To: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
- Cc: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Charles White wrote: > > Jos and others, > > Could you all send me some encapsulated results or pointers to them of > how your tools fare on the testcases. Jos seems to have the jump here > with 255 of 268, so I just have to track the other 13 :-) Charles. I am only attempting those tests that are marked as being in DL. Detailed results are at [1]. We are currently passing 142 out of 156 (ignoring those in which unsupported datatypes are being used). On the telecon, Dan mentioned the possibility of marking up/publishing results using RDF. This sounds like a sensible idea and it would be easy for me to produce this. Would it be possible to extend the test ontology [2] to include descriptions of test results? Sean [1] http://wonderweb.man.ac.uk/owl/first-order.shtml [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/testOntology -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 05:02:51 UTC