- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:03:50 -0400
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
amp;In-Reply-To=<3B7D4E97.9229BEE5@bell-labs.com>&References=<3B7D4E97.9229BEE5@bell-labs.com>Content-Type: text/plain Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (http://www.w3.org/) Message-Id: <1060884229.12246.26.camel@dirk.dm93.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:03:49 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In previous WebOnt WG publications, I neglected to follow this rule... "All disclosure statements made by W3C Members are made public with each publicly-visible Working Draft (public Working Draft, Last Call Working Draft, Candidate Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation, Recommendation)." -- 3. Disclosure Rules Current Patent Practice W3C Note 24 January 2002 http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-patent-practice-20020124#sec-Disclosure cited from the WebOnt charter http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/charter#L409 In preparation for a Candidate Recommendation publication of OWL, the WebOnt WG disclosures page http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/discl $Revision: 1.14 $ of $Date: 2003/08/11 19:01:19 $ now includes details about each member organization's patent disclosure statements. (expect the formatting to change; there's some sort of common style emerging). For the most part, it just gives the date each organization checked the "no claims" box on the call for participation, but for Lucent, Network Inference, and Stanford, who didn't check any of the boxes, it has a copy of the statements they sent. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 14:03:51 UTC