Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>"The suggested reading order of the first four documents is as given,
>>since they have
>> been listed in increasing degree of technical content."
>>
>>(I could add something to state that
>> "the last two documents complete the documentation set .)
>>
>>
>
>My sense is that the section as currently written is clear enough, but
>if Frank feels strongly that the implied reading order is not clear
>enough, I don't see any problem with your proposed change.
>
>
>
>>dan/sandro - should i put this in my editors draft right after the
>>listing in the roadmap? (I released control on friday so i have not
>>made any changes since then and do not want to hinder your release process.)
>>
>>
>
>That sounds fine. (I think I would have heard had Dan done anything
>with them since then; if he has, I'll take responsibility for
>propagating this change through.)
>
> -- sandro
>
>
>
OK - change made in the normal place for the editor's draft. that is
the only change i made since i gave up write lock and i will not make
any more (unless there is another request communicated).
feel free to do whatever you need to do to push the publication through.
thx,
d
--
Deborah L. McGuinness
Knowledge Systems Laboratory
Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020
email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm
(voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941