Re: [Fwd: Question on OWL Lite]

Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> 
> 
> Is this a small error in reference?
> (sorry I have not drilled down myself)

Yes, this was an eoor. Will be fixed in the new editor's draft today.
Guus

> 
> Jeremy
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Question on OWL Lite
> 
> In the OWL Web Ontology Language Reference (latest version) The subsection
> "rdfs:range" under section 4.1 (RDF Schema constructs) makes a note about
> the use of rdf:range in OWL Lite. According to the note "the range value
> of a rdfs:range axiom must be a class identifier". I was under the
> assumption that (in OWL Lite) datatypes could be considered as a valid
> range value for rdfs:range, and not just class identifiers. Can someone
> please clarify?
> 
> Thanks,
> Deepali
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 08:52:08 UTC