Re: Overview document

> http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm -

A few nits, looking the version dated "30 July".

There's a typo (missing ">")in the markup at the end of section 1.3,
so it renders for me as:

   The details of these and other constraints on OWL DL and OWL Lite
   are explained in .  

The source seems be using ^M newlines, which confuses at least one of
my browsers into rendered the second sentence of the introduction
like:

    The Document Roadmap sectionbelow describes 
                                ^ no space

I wonder how much has changed since this document was last validated?

The links within the document (like that "Document Roadmap") link go
to the "latest" version, instead of being relative to the current
document.  That is, it's
   <A HREF="http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/#s1.1">
when it should be
   <A HREF="#s1.1">

After sleeping on it, I think I'd be happier if Requirements were
actually mentioned in the roadmap, instead of in the paragraph after
the roadmap.   Would that be okay?

     -- sandro

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 14:06:31 UTC