Re: LANG: Moving issues 5.6 and 5.14 forward

>
>
>I don't know where Jim's information came from.
>
>The only restriction would be that the non-RDF stuff comes before the RDF
>stuff, although it may even be possible to finesse that.

Jim gets his information from [1] which is the grammar section of the 
RDF/XML syntax specification which states the rdf:RDF must be the 
ROOT of the RDF/XML document - as it says there

>5.2 doc  root(document-element=RDF, children=list(RDF))

   Further, the editor of that document was in my office as I wrote 
the message, following a multihour discussion where we debated best 
way to do these things (believe it or not, I do do my homework 
Peter!).  It is possible that we have identified an incocnsistency in 
the new RDF documents - but my guess is it gets down to the issue of 
what is an XML document which has RDF in it, and what is an RDF/XML 
document (i.e. those with MIME type "application/rdf+xml" - the 
proposed type for RDF/XML).
  I will see the editor again later today and will ask him about this 
inconsistency.
  -JH




http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-grammar-summary
-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 16:13:38 UTC