- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 21:55:19 +0200
- To: "pat hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
I'm really liking your document Pat
and I've already read it 2 times
We try to focus on weak with a
minimal set of inference rules
-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
pat hayes
<phayes@ai.uwf.ed To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
u> cc:
Sent by: Subject: semantics layering document revision.
www-webont-wg-req
uest@w3.org
2002-09-24 03:09
AM
The document has been revised in the light of Peter's comments and
can be found at
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/RDFS2OWL-L.html
I have highlighted the important changes in red. They are mostly
technical tweaks to the basic semantic conditions on weak OWL in
order to support the required entailments. I believe that this now
handles all the points raised by Peter in his last message. There may
still be some slight glitches in the green tables, and there are a
few places where I just don't know what the right answer is (eg must
the range of an OWL property be an OWL class? Are all datatypes OWL
classes?) but Im sure it can be tweaked to fit whatever people want.
Pat
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC (850)434 8903
home
40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416
office
Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 15:55:56 UTC