- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:35:15 -0400
- To: <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > RDFS already allows multiple ranges, just as does OWL, and gives them > intersection semantics, just as does OWL. > Hrmmph ... this seems counterintuitive, I'd assumed that RDFS applied union-of semantics to multiple ranges. I suspect that this entire argument depends on whether intersection vs. union semantics are applied to multiple rdfs:ranges... Jonathan
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 20:53:01 UTC