- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:11:31 +0200
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-webont-wg@w3.org
[...] > As far as OWL is concerned, > > foo rdfs:range bar . > > should follow from > > foo rdfs:range baz . > baz rdfs:subClassOf bar . > > This would fit in with the general OWL stance on these sorts of things. I would think that that is OK, at least according to our findings in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0215.html but maybe we haven't thought hard enough... -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 10:12:12 UTC